Jump to Content
T2RERC  


abstract

introduction

method

status

references


home > research > efficacy studies

R4: Efficacy Studies

References

 
  1. Batavia AI, Hammer GS (1990). "Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices." Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 27 No.4.pp.425-436
  2. Bauer SM, Lane JP (2002). "A systematic process for successful technology transfer." Proceedings of the RESNA '02 Annual Conference. Arlington, VA: RESNA Press, 309-311.
  3. Fuhrer MJ (2002). "Observer's Report on Research for the 2002 RERC Summative Program Review, Final Draft." 10/08/02
  4. Green WS (1999) and Jordan, P.W. Human Factors in Product Design. London: Taylor and Francis.
  5. Jordan PW (1998). An Introduction to Usability. London: Taylor and Francis
  6. Lane JP (1996). "Products for People with Disabilities: What Exists and How to Market Your Invention (Parts I - III)." Inventor's Digest, Xll, (3, 4 & 5).
  7. Lane JP, Usiak DJ, Moffat JA (1996). Consumer criteria for assistive devices: Operationalizing generic criteria for specific ABLEDATA categories. In A. Langton (Ed.), Proceedings of the RESNA '96 Annual Conference (pp. 146-148). Arlington, VA: RESNA Press.
  8. Lane JP, Usiak DJ, Stone VI, Scherer MJ (1997)."The voice of the customer: consumers define the ideal battery charger", Assistive Technology: 9.2., 130-139.
  9. Leahy JA, Lane JP (2002). "Paths to Market." Proceedings of the RESNA '02 Annual Conference. Arlington, VA: RESNA Press, 204-206.
  10. Popovic V (1999). Product Evaluation Methods and their importance in designing interactive artifacts. In: Green and Jordan. (1999) Human Factors in Product Design. London: Taylor and Francis (p.27)
  11. Rooden MJ, Green WS, Kanis H (1999). Difficulties in usage of a coffeemaker predicted on the basis of design models. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society 43 rd Annual Meeting
  12. Rouse WB (1991). Design for Success. NY: John Wiley and sons, Inc (P.3
  13. Scriven M (1973). The methodology of evaluation. In Worthen, B.R, & Sanders, J.R. (1973). Educational evaluation: Theory and practice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
  14. Scriven M (1991). Evaluation Thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. (P. 112; 293-5; 364-365).
  15. Scriven M (1994). "Product Evaluation—the State of the Art". Evaluation Practice, 15 (1), 45–62.
  16. Stone VI, Lane JP (2002). "Critical success factors in technology transfer." Proceedings of the RESNA '02 Annual Conference. Arlington, VA: RESNA Press, 207-209.
  17. Stone VI, Bauer SM, Leahy JA (2003). "Ensuring effective technology transfer through evaluation" RESNA 26th Annual Conference
  18. The Center for Universal Design. (2002). Evaluating the Universal Design Performance of Products, Raleigh: NC State University
  19. The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The Program Evaluation Standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications
  20. Trace Center. Designing a More Usable World – for All. Retrieved June 2, 2003 from the Website: http://trace.wisc.edu/world/. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison

[ Top of Page ]